Theorems / novel_alg_04

Authored

Algebra · medium

Statement, exactly as the model and Lean see it
theorem lg_target (x y : ℝ) (h₁ : x + y = 10) (h₂ : x - y = 4) : x * y = 21 := by
Source
Written for LeanGraph, reference proof certified
Premises used by the reference proof
53

Traces

Each configuration's full record: what was retrieved, what the model wrote, what Lean said back.

Verified0 model calls · 7 Lean checks · $0.00000

Attempts

  1. attempt 1Wrong tactic
    Proof
    rfl
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    4:2: error: Tactic `rfl` failed: The left-hand side
      x * y
    is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
      21
    
    x y : ℝ
    h₁ : x + y = 10
    h₂ : x - y = 4
    ⊢ x * y = 21
  2. attempt 2Other
    Proof
    decide
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    4:2: error: Expected type must not contain free variables
      x * y = 21
    
    Hint: Use the `+revert` option to automatically clean up and revert free variables
  3. attempt 3Valid but mathematically wrong
    Proof
    norm_num
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    3:79: error: unsolved goals
    x y : ℝ
    h₁ : x + y = 10
    h₂ : x - y = 4
    ⊢ x * y = 21
  4. attempt 4Wrong tactic
    Proof
    simp
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    4:2: error: `simp` made no progress
  5. attempt 5Wrong tactic
    Proof
    ring
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    4:2: info: Try this:
      [apply] ring_nf
      
      The `ring` tactic failed to close the goal. Use `ring_nf` to obtain a normal form.
        
      Note that `ring` works primarily in *commutative* rings. If you have a noncommutative ring, abelian group or module, consider using `noncomm_ring`, `abel` or `module` instead.
    3:79: error: unsolved goals
    x y : ℝ
    h₁ : x + y = 10
    h₂ : x - y = 4
    ⊢ x * y = 21
  6. attempt 6Wrong tactic
    Proof
    linarith
    What Lean printed (this is all the model sees on repair)
    4:2: error: linarith failed to find a contradiction
    case h1
    x y : ℝ
    h₁ : x + y = 10
    h₂ : x - y = 4
    a✝ : x * y < 21
    ⊢ False
    failed
  7. attempt 7Verified
    Proof
    nlinarith

Verified proof

theorem lg_target (x y : ℝ) (h₁ : x + y = 10) (h₂ : x - y = 4) : x * y = 21 := by
  nlinarith

Axioms used: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound

Reference proof

The proof we wrote and certified before any model ran.

have hx : x = 7 := by linarith
have hy : y = 3 := by linarith
subst hx hy
norm_num